Furlpay Cli vs Gate DEX MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Furlpay Cli and Gate DEX MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Furlpay Cli when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Furlpay Cli Details

Choose Gate DEX MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Gate DEX MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Furlpay Cli Finance & Fintech	Gate DEX MCP Finance & Fintech
Summary	Stablecoin payments, swaps, stock orders, market data, travel booking, yield and card controls.	Gate DEX MCP for wallet auth, transfers, swaps, token info, market data, and RPC access.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "furlpay-cli": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@furlpay/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gate-dex-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcporter"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons