Fullrun vs Adrex AI

In-depth architectural comparison of the Fullrun and Adrex AI MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose Fullrun when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Fullrun Details

Choose Adrex AI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Adrex AI Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F Fullrun Developer Tools	Adrex AI Developer Tools
Summary	Google Ads management for AI agents — diagnose, optimize, and manage campaigns.	Open-source MCP server for Google Ads & Meta Ads — manage campaigns from any AI assistant.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fullrun": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "fullrun"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "adrex-ai": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons