Fullrun vs Adops MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Fullrun and Adops MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Fullrun when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Fullrun Details

Choose Adops MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Adops MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Fullrun Developer Tools	Adops MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Google Ads management for AI agents — diagnose, optimize, and manage campaigns.	AI-powered cross-platform ad management for Google Ads and Meta Ads.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fullrun": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "@fullrun/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "adops-mcp": {
      "url": "https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-blue.svg)](LICENSE"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons