FullEnrich vs ZoomInfo

In-depth architectural comparison of the FullEnrich and ZoomInfo MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose FullEnrich when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FullEnrich Details

Choose ZoomInfo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ZoomInfo Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F FullEnrich Developer Tools	ZoomInfo Developer Tools
Summary	Search B2B contacts, enrich verified emails and phone numbers, and export results.	Official ZoomInfo MCP server. Search and enrich companies, contacts, and buyer intent signals.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fullenrich": {
      "url": "https://img.shields.io/github/license/FullEnrich/fullenrich-skills)](./LICENSE"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "zoominfo": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote@0.1.16",
        "https://mcp.zoominfo.com/mcp",
        "--static-oauth-client-metadata",
        "{\\",
        ":\\",
        "}"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons