FullEnrich vs Prospeo MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the FullEnrich and Prospeo MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose FullEnrich when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FullEnrich Details

Choose Prospeo MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Prospeo MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F FullEnrich Developer Tools	Prospeo MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	Search B2B contacts, enrich verified emails and phone numbers, and export results.	Prospeo: Find, search, and enrich people and companies with verified emails and mobile numbers.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fullenrich": {
      "url": "https://img.shields.io/github/license/FullEnrich/fullenrich-skills)](./LICENSE"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "prospeo-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "Run"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons