What is the key difference between Fruityvice and Disify?

Fruityvice belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while Disify belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Fruityvice or Disify in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Fruityvice and Disify free or paid?

Fruityvice operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Disify operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Fruityvice lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Disify lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Fruityvice and Disify together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Fruityvice vs Disify

In-depth architectural comparison of the Fruityvice and Disify MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Fruityvice

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Disify

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Fruityvice if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Disify if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Fruityvice when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Fruityvice Details

Choose Disify when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Disify Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F Fruityvice Developer Tools	D Disify Developer Tools
Summary	Fruityvice MCP — wraps Fruityvice API (free, no auth)	Disify MCP — wraps Disify API (free, no auth)
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Fruityvice Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Disify Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Fruityvice Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fruityvice": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "fruityvice"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Disify Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "disify": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "disify"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Fruityvice is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Disify belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Fruityvice when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Disify when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Fruityvice More alternatives to Disify Developer Tools category hub Canonical compare URL

Related MCP Server Comparisons

Popular comparisons with Fruityvice

Popular comparisons with Disify

Disify vs Anilist