Frisk vs X402 Receipt Verifier

In-depth architectural comparison of the Frisk and X402 Receipt Verifier MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Frisk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Frisk Details

X

Choose X402 Receipt Verifier when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore X402 Receipt Verifier Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Frisk Finance & Fintech	X X402 Receipt Verifier Finance & Fintech
Summary	Screen the counterparty of an x402 payment before an agent pays it. Runs offline by default.	Audits NEXUS's own x402 payment logs against its own delivery logs and issues a signed proof-of-deli
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "frisk": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "frisk-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "x402-receipt-verifier": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "x402-receipt-verifier"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons