Frisk vs Solana X402 Compliance

In-depth architectural comparison of the Frisk and Solana X402 Compliance MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Frisk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Frisk Details

S

Choose Solana X402 Compliance when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Solana X402 Compliance Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Frisk Finance & Fintech	S Solana X402 Compliance Finance & Fintech
Summary	Screen the counterparty of an x402 payment before an agent pays it. Runs offline by default.	RFC 9110 x402 Solana compliance screening and micropayments gateway for AI agents.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "frisk": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "frisk-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "solana-x402-compliance": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "solana-x402-compliance"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons