Framebench vs Framebench

In-depth architectural comparison of the Framebench and Framebench MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose Framebench when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Framebench Details

Choose Framebench when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: check_game, compare, recommend_upgrade.

Explore Framebench Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F Framebench Developer Tools	Framebench Developer Tools
Summary	Estimated game fps for any GPU or Apple Silicon chip, with the limiter and tweaks.	Estimated game fps for any GPU or Apple Silicon chip, with the limiter and tweaks.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "framebench": {
      "url": "https://framebench.app"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "framebench-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "framebench-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons