What is the key difference between Fossick and RepoFold?

Fossick belongs to the Version Control category with local stdio execution, while RepoFold belongs to the Version Control category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Fossick or RepoFold in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Fossick and RepoFold free or paid?

Fossick operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). RepoFold operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Fossick lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. RepoFold lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Fossick and RepoFold together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Fossick or RepoFold in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Fossick and RepoFold free to use, or do they require API keys?

Fossick is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . RepoFold operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Fossick and RepoFold at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both fossick and repofold as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Fossick has a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. RepoFold holds a Quality Score of 42 /100 ( Fair ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Fossick vs RepoFold

In-depth architectural comparison of the Fossick and RepoFold MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Fossick

Version Control · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

RepoFold

Version Control · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 42/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Fossick if you need specialized Version Control tools running via a local process. Choose RepoFold if your workspace requires Version Control integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Fossick when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Version Control domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Fossick Details

Choose RepoFold when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Version Control domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore RepoFold Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F Fossick Version Control	R RepoFold Version Control
Summary	Search all of GitHub from your AI agent — find libraries, drill into repos, find code patterns.	A cited wiki of your GitHub repo: search, read pages, find symbols and ask, with line citations.
Category & Scope	Version Control	Version Control
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Fossick Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

RepoFold Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Fossick Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fossick": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "fossick"
      ]
    }
  }
}

RepoFold Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "repofold": {
      "url": "https://repofold.dev"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Fossick is categorized under Version Control and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, RepoFold belongs to Version Control using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Fossick when you need capabilities focused on version control and RepoFold when you require tools for version control.

More alternatives to Fossick More alternatives to RepoFold Version Control category hub

Related MCP Server Comparisons

Popular comparisons with Fossick

Popular comparisons with RepoFold

M
RepoFold vs Mcp