Fortress vs Minerva MCP — Microsoft 365 & Azure

In-depth architectural comparison of the Fortress and Minerva MCP — Microsoft 365 & Azure MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Fortress when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Fortress Details

Choose Minerva MCP — Microsoft 365 & Azure when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: microsoft_graph_call, azure_arm_call, microsoft_search.

Explore Minerva MCP — Microsoft 365 & Azure Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Fortress Cloud Platforms	Minerva MCP — Microsoft 365 & Azure Cloud Platforms
Summary	Stealth browser for AI agents: fetch pages behind Cloudflare/DataDome/CAPTCHA, extract clean data.	Microsoft 365 & Azure admin: Graph, ARM, and the PowerShell cmdlets Graph does not expose.
Category & Scope	Cloud Platforms	Cloud Platforms

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fortress": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "tilion-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "minerva-mcp-microsoft-365-azure": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "minerva-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons