Formio MCP vs Patchwork — Codebase Conventions for AI Agents

In-depth architectural comparison of the Formio MCP and Patchwork — Codebase Conventions for AI Agents MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Formio MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Formio MCP Details

Choose Patchwork — Codebase Conventions for AI Agents when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Patchwork — Codebase Conventions for AI Agents Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Formio MCP Developer Tools	Patchwork — Codebase Conventions for AI Agents Developer Tools
Summary	Create and manage Form.io forms, resources, actions, roles, and projects from your AI agent.	Scan any codebase, generate CONVENTIONS.md, expose conventions as MCP tools for AI agents.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "formio-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@formio/mcp@0.13.0"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "patchwork-codebase-conventions-for-ai-agents": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "patchwork-conventions"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons