Football Database and Results vs Prisma MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Football Database and Results and Prisma MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose Football Database and Results when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Football Database and Results Details

Choose Prisma MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: other (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: CreateBackupTool, CreateConnectionStringTool, CreateRecoveryTool.

Explore Prisma MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F Football Database and Results Databases	Prisma MCP prisma Databases
Summary	Historical football results, teams, competitions and draw/streak statistics via 10 read-only tools.	Gives LLMs the ability to manage Prisma Postgres databases (e.g. spin up new databases and run migrations or queries).
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "football-database-and-results": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "football-database-and-results"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "prisma-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "prisma",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons