Football Database and Results vs Mongo MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Football Database and Results and Mongo MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose Football Database and Results when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Football Database and Results Details

Choose Mongo MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: other (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Collection schema inspection, Filtered document queries, Single-document CRUD operations.

Explore Mongo MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F Football Database and Results Databases	Mongo MCP QuantGeekDev Databases
Summary	Historical football results, draws and no-draw streaks. 11 read-only tools, 6 need no API key.	MongoDB integration that enables LLMs to interact directly with databases.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "football-database-and-results-2": {
      "url": "https://fdb4.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "quantgeekdev-mongo-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "mongo-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons