Football Database and… vs Supabase MCP Server | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Football Database and Results vs Supabase MCP Server
In-depth architectural comparison of the Football Database and Results and Supabase MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Football Database and Results
Databases · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Supabase MCP Server
Databases · Local stdio
Quality: 48/100 (Fair) | Auth: API Key required
Verdict Summary: Choose Football Database and Results if you need specialized Databases tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Supabase MCP Server if your workspace requires Databases integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
F
Choose Football Database and Results when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
You have access to required keys: SUPABASE_PROJECT_REF, SUPABASE_DB_PASSWORD, SUPABASE_REGION, SUPABASE_ACCESS_TOKEN, SUPABASE_SERVICE_ROLE_KEY, QUERY_API_KEY.
Football Database and Results is categorized under Databases and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Supabase MCP Server belongs to Databases using local stdio subprocess. Select Football Database and Results when you need capabilities focused on databases and Supabase MCP Server when you require tools for databases.