Follow Up Boss vs Exogram Authority Runtime

In-depth architectural comparison of the Follow Up Boss and Exogram Authority Runtime MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Follow Up Boss when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: FUB_API_KEY.
• Primary tools included: 160 tools covering the Follow Up Boss API, Safe Mode with deletion tools disabled, Contact, deal, task, and appointment management.

Explore Follow Up Boss Details

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: create_entities, create_relations, add_observations.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Follow Up Boss Developer Tools	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools
Summary
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "follow-up-boss": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "follow-up-boss"
      ],
      "env": {
        "FUB_API_KEY": "YOUR_FUB_API_KEY_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons