Floom vs Sota

In-depth architectural comparison of the Floom and Sota MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Floom when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Floom Details

S

Choose Sota when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: deploy, get-logs, set-env.

Explore Sota Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Floom Developer Tools	S Sota Developer Tools
Summary	Deploy Python functions as web apps with auto-generated UI, REST API, and shareable links.	Deploy web apps via AI agents with sota.io. 9 tools for deploy, logs, env, and more.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "floom": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@floomhq/floom"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sota": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@sota-io/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons