Fixflow vs Procheiron

In-depth architectural comparison of the Fixflow and Procheiron MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Fixflow when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Fixflow Details

Choose Procheiron when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Procheiron Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Fixflow Knowledge & Memory	Procheiron Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Collective memory for AI agents. One agent solves a bug — every agent gets the fix instantly.	Review gate for shared agent memory: an unreviewed or hand-edited memory is never served.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fixflow": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "supergateway"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "procheiron": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "procheiron"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons