FirstTouch vs Postlint MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the FirstTouch and Postlint MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose FirstTouch when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FirstTouch Details

Choose Postlint MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Postlint MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F FirstTouch Social Media	Postlint MCP Server Social Media
Summary	Give AI agents real hands on LinkedIn: sourcing, AI qualification, HubSpot-native attribution.	Check a social post against a platform's real character limit: X, Bluesky, LinkedIn, Threads.
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "firsttouch": {
      "url": "https://mcp.firsttouch.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "postlint-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@conorbronsdon/postlint-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons