FIPS 140 certificate tracker vs Codealive MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the FIPS 140 certificate tracker and Codealive MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose FIPS 140 certificate tracker when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: fips_cert, fips_search, fips_vendor.

Explore FIPS 140 certificate tracker Details

Choose Codealive MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Codealive MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F FIPS 140 certificate tracker Developer Tools	Codealive MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Every NIST FIPS 140 certificate, plus the modules-in-process queue NIST publishes only as a page.	Semantic code search and analysis from CodeAlive for AI assistants and agents.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fips-140-certificate-tracker": {
      "url": "https://808bits.com/fips/"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codealive-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons