FillTrust security questionnaire corpus vs PraisonAI

In-depth architectural comparison of the FillTrust security questionnaire corpus and PraisonAI MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose FillTrust security questionnaire corpus when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FillTrust security questionnaire corpus Details

Choose PraisonAI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PraisonAI Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F FillTrust security questionnaire corpus Developer Tools	PraisonAI Developer Tools
Summary	Guidance for answering vendor security questionnaires. Every result carries the page it came from.	AI Agents Framework with Self Reflection and MCP support
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "filltrust-security-questionnaire-corpus": {
      "url": "https://www.filltrust.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "praisonai": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons