FillTrust security questionnaire corpus vs Packkit

In-depth architectural comparison of the FillTrust security questionnaire corpus and Packkit MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose FillTrust security questionnaire corpus when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FillTrust security questionnaire corpus Details

Choose Packkit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Packkit Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F FillTrust security questionnaire corpus Developer Tools	Packkit Developer Tools
Summary	Guidance for answering vendor security questionnaires. Every result carries the page it came from.	Scaffold modern npm packages, CLIs, services and apps as a native tool for AI agents.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "filltrust-security-questionnaire-corpus": {
      "url": "https://www.filltrust.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "packkit-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "npx"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons