Filipe Coffee vs Centro — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Filipe Coffee vs Centro
In-depth architectural comparison of the Filipe Coffee and Centro MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Filipe Coffee
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 29/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Centro
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 30/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Filipe Coffee if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Centro if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
F
Choose Filipe Coffee when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Filipe Coffee is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Centro belongs to Developer Tools using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Filipe Coffee when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Centro when you require tools for developer tools.