Filingpulse vs FilingFirehose

In-depth architectural comparison of the Filingpulse and FilingFirehose MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose Filingpulse when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Filingpulse Details

Choose FilingFirehose when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FilingFirehose Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F Filingpulse Developer Tools	FilingFirehose Developer Tools
Summary	Hosted SEC EDGAR filings: Form 4 insider trades, 8-K events, S-1/IPO registrations. Read-only.	SEC EDGAR filings parsed: 8-K body-text classification, 13D activist tagging, S-3 ATM detection.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "filingpulse": {
      "url": "https://filingpulse.io/mcp.html"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "filingfirehose": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "filing-firehose"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons