Figmanage vs Whooshly MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Figmanage and Whooshly MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Figmanage when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: check_auth, list_orgs, switch_org.

Explore Figmanage Details

Choose Whooshly MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_billing_status, create_link, list_links.

Explore Whooshly MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Figmanage Communication	Whooshly MCP Communication
Summary	Manage your Figma workspace. 76 tools for files, projects, teams, permissions, and org admin.	Create short links, QR codes, UTM templates, and vCards from your AI assistant.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "figmanage": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "figmanage"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "whooshly-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "whooshly-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons