Fiber AI vs ZOOQ LinkedIn Data for AI Agents

In-depth architectural comparison of the Fiber AI and ZOOQ LinkedIn Data for AI Agents MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Fiber AI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: api_companySearch, api_peopleSearch, api_individualRevealSync.

Explore Fiber AI Details

Choose ZOOQ LinkedIn Data for AI Agents when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ZOOQ LinkedIn Data for AI Agents Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Fiber AI Communication	ZOOQ LinkedIn Data for AI Agents Communication
Summary	Search companies, enrich contacts, and reveal emails and phones from your AI agent.	Live LinkedIn data for AI agents: profiles, companies, jobs, posts, email finding. No account risk.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fiber-ai": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "zooq-linkedin-data-for-ai-agents": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "zooq-linkedin-data-for-ai-agents"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons