Fiber AI vs MCP Pearch

In-depth architectural comparison of the Fiber AI and MCP Pearch MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Fiber AI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: api_companySearch, api_peopleSearch, api_individualRevealSync.

Explore Fiber AI Details

Choose MCP Pearch when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Freemium).
• You have access to required keys: PEARCH_API_KEY, PEARCH_API_URL.
• Primary tools included: search_people, search_company_leads, get_profile.

Explore MCP Pearch Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Fiber AI Search & Data Extraction	MCP Pearch Pearch-ai Search & Data Extraction
Summary	Search companies, enrich contacts, and reveal emails and phones from your AI agent.	Best people search engine that reduces the time spent on talent discovery
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fiber-ai": {
      "url": "https://mcp.fiber.ai/mcp/v2"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pearch-ai-mcp-pearch": {
      "url": "https://mcp.pearch.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons