Fiber AI vs MCP Apollo

In-depth architectural comparison of the Fiber AI and MCP Apollo MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Fiber AI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: api_companySearch, api_peopleSearch, api_individualRevealSync.

Explore Fiber AI Details

Choose MCP Apollo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: apollo_search_people, apollo_enrich_person, apollo_search_companies.

Explore MCP Apollo Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Fiber AI Communication	MCP Apollo Communication
Summary	Search companies, enrich contacts, and reveal emails and phones from your AI agent.	Apollo.io MCP server. Search people, enrich contacts, find emails, research companies.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fiber-ai": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-apollo": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "wrangler"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons