FetchV2 vs Mastercard Developers MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the FetchV2 and Mastercard Developers MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose FetchV2 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FetchV2 Details

Choose Mastercard Developers MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Mastercard Developers MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F FetchV2 Developer Tools	Mastercard Developers MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Fetch and extract web pages, discover links, and read llms.txt documentation indexes.	Access Mastercard Developers APIs, documentation, and API specifications through MCP.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fetchv2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "fetchv2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mastercard-developers-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@mastercard/developers-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons