FetchRelay vs Kreuzcrawl

In-depth architectural comparison of the FetchRelay and Kreuzcrawl MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose FetchRelay when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FetchRelay Details

Choose Kreuzcrawl when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kreuzcrawl Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F FetchRelay Developer Tools	Kreuzcrawl Developer Tools
Summary	Extract public webpages as Markdown, map sites, and run bounded crawl jobs. API key required.	Scrape, crawl, and map websites to Markdown or JSON via local CLI.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fetchrelay": {
      "url": "https://fetchrelay.com/integrations/mcp?utm_source=mcp&utm_medium=integration&utm_campaign=mcp-launch"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kreuzcrawl": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "crawlberg"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons