Fedramp Docs MCP vs Teamspend

In-depth architectural comparison of the Fedramp Docs MCP and Teamspend MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Fedramp Docs MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Fedramp Docs MCP Details

Choose Teamspend when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Teamspend Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Fedramp Docs MCP Developer Tools	Teamspend Developer Tools
Summary	Query FedRAMP 20x KSIs, NIST controls, and compliance docs via 20 MCP tools.	Compares AI coding tool spend before and after a migration via MCP tools.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fedramp-docs-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "fedramp-docs-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "teamspend": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "teamspend-cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons