FavCRM vs Vibe Provision

In-depth architectural comparison of the FavCRM and Vibe Provision MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose FavCRM when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: title, readOnlyHint, destructiveHint.

Explore FavCRM Details

V

Choose Vibe Provision when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: vibe_provision_status, vibe_provision_up, vibe_provision_add.

Explore Vibe Provision Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	FavCRM Communication	V Vibe Provision Communication
Summary	Agentic CRM for service businesses — bookings, customers, WhatsApp, loyalty, invoicing.	Provision SaaS services from YAML and inject .env. Supports Clerk, Stripe, Resend and more.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "favcrm": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vibe-provision": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "vibe-provision"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons