FateStar Ziwei vs Servicenow MCP AI

In-depth architectural comparison of the FateStar Ziwei and Servicenow MCP AI MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose FateStar Ziwei when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Data Visualization domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FateStar Ziwei Details

Choose Servicenow MCP AI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Data Visualization domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: all.

Explore Servicenow MCP AI Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	FateStar Ziwei Data Visualization	Servicenow MCP AI Data Visualization
Summary	Zi Wei Dou Shu for AI agents: free natal charts, six transit levels, and optional readings.	ServiceNow MCP server — 65 tools over the full REST surface, every auth method, flows, diagrams.
Category & Scope	Data Visualization	Data Visualization

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fatestar-ziwei": {
      "url": "https://www.fatestar.top/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "servicenow-mcp-ai-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "servicenow-mcp-ai"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons