Faithk7 Gmail MCP vs Telerivet

In-depth architectural comparison of the Faithk7 Gmail MCP and Telerivet MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Faithk7 Gmail MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Faithk7 Gmail MCP Details

T

Choose Telerivet when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Telerivet Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Faithk7 Gmail MCP Communication	T Telerivet Communication
Summary	Manage Gmail messages, threads, labels, drafts, and settings from your workflows. Send and organiz…	Send, automate, and orchestrate SMS, WhatsApp, Viber, IVR, and USSD messaging in 150+ countries.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "faithk7-gmail-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@shinzolabs/gmail-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "telerivet": {
      "url": "https://telerivet.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons