Faithk7 Gmail MCP vs Telegram (mcp Telegram)

In-depth architectural comparison of the Faithk7 Gmail MCP and Telegram (mcp Telegram) MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Faithk7 Gmail MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Faithk7 Gmail MCP Details

Choose Telegram (mcp Telegram) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Telegram (mcp Telegram) Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Faithk7 Gmail MCP Communication	Telegram (mcp Telegram) Communication
Summary	Manage Gmail messages, threads, labels, drafts, and settings from your workflows. Send and organiz…	MCP server for Telegram userbot — messages, media, reactions, polls & more. Built on GramJS/MTProto.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "faithk7-gmail-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@shinzolabs/gmail-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "telegram-mcp-telegram": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@overpod/mcp-telegram"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons