FairMind Project Context vs Todox

In-depth architectural comparison of the FairMind Project Context and Todox MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

F

Choose FairMind Project Context when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FairMind Project Context Details

Choose Todox when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Todox Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	F FairMind Project Context Knowledge & Memory	Todox Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Project memory for coding agents: requirements, decisions, code graph and delivery telemetry.	Memory for coding agents: the decisions, the dead ends, and where the last session stopped.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fairmind-project-context": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "fairmind-project-context"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "todox": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "https"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons