Facebook Publisher vs Wenyan MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Facebook Publisher and Wenyan MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Facebook Publisher when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Facebook Publisher Details

Choose Wenyan MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: other (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: WECHAT_APP_ID, WECHAT_APP_SECRET.
• Primary tools included: Markdown-to-WeChat rich-text rendering, Built-in and custom formatting themes, Local and remote image uploads.

Explore Wenyan MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Facebook Publisher Social Media	Wenyan MCP caol64 Social Media
Summary	Safe Facebook Pages publishing with brand-voice, image-required & anti-duplication checks.	Wenyan MCP Server, which lets AI automatically format Markdown articles and publish them to WeChat GZH.
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "facebook-publisher": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-fb-publisher"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "caol64-wenyan-mcp": {
      "url": "https://api.example.com"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons