Codemcp vs Taskhold
A side-by-side look at the Codemcp and Taskhold MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Codemcp for coding agents work as a local process; choose Taskhold for coding agents. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Codemcp when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Coding Agents domain.
- You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
- Its auth model fits you: No auth required.
Feature & specification comparison
Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | T Taskhold | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding Agents | Coding Agents |
| Quality signal | 44/100 · Fair | 45/100 · Fair |
| Install command | Confirmed | Not confirmed yet |
| Transport | Local subprocess (stdio) | — |
| Auth | No auth required | Not declared |
| Pricing | Free | Paid service |
| Required env vars | None listed | None listed |
| Verified owner | Community listing | Community listing |
| GitHub stars | 1,605 | — |
| Directory activity | 6 views 0 installs 0 upvotes | 0 views 0 installs 0 upvotes |
| Tools | Not listed | Not listed |
| Full listing | View Codemcp | View Taskhold |
Tools & capabilities
Codemcp tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Taskhold tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Codemcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"ezyang-codemcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"--from",
"git+https://github.com/ezyang/codemcp@prod",
"codemcp"
]
}
}
}
Taskhold
No confirmed install command for Taskhold yet — follow the setup steps linked from its listing page rather than a guessed package name.