EZTexting MCP vs Plixana

In-depth architectural comparison of the EZTexting MCP and Plixana MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose EZTexting MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore EZTexting MCP Details

P

Choose Plixana when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Plixana Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	EZTexting MCP Communication	P Plixana Communication
Summary	Official EZTexting MCP server: SMS/MMS messaging, contacts, workflows, reports.	Operate the Plixana CRM from any AI: contacts, deals, quotes, WhatsApp and metrics.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "eztexting-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@eztexting/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "plixana": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "plixana"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons