Extract vs NanoParse MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Extract and NanoParse MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Extract when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Extract Details

Choose NanoParse MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore NanoParse MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Extract Developer Tools	NanoParse MCP Developer Tools
Summary	URL-to-Markdown API for AI pipelines — clean markdown with metadata and caching.	Fetch any web page to clean Markdown with Litmus trust signals. No account or API key needed.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "extract-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@averra/extract-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nanoparse-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@coinbase/payments-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons