Exogram Authority Runtime vs Web Browser (kogiQA)

In-depth architectural comparison of the Exogram Authority Runtime and Web Browser (kogiQA) MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

W

Choose Web Browser (kogiQA) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Web Browser (kogiQA) Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools	W Web Browser (kogiQA) Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.	This web browser has been designed to help your agent debug and develop complex web applications.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "web-browser-kogiqa": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "web-browser-kogiqa"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons