Exogram Authority Runtime vs Tollbooth Oauth2 Collector

In-depth architectural comparison of the Exogram Authority Runtime and Tollbooth Oauth2 Collector MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

Choose Tollbooth Oauth2 Collector when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Tollbooth Oauth2 Collector Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools	Tollbooth Oauth2 Collector Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.	Unauthenticated OAuth2 callback collector for Tollbooth MCP services
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tollbooth-oauth2-collector": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "tollbooth-oauth2-collector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons