Exogram Authority Runtime vs Speckitacceptance MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Exogram Authority Runtime and Speckitacceptance MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

Choose Speckitacceptance MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: check_spec_acceptance, map_diff_to_requirements, verify_acceptance_evidence.

Explore Speckitacceptance MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools	Speckitacceptance MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.	Paid remote MCP for spec driven development acceptance gate MCP, structured receipts, audit logs, an
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "speckitacceptance-mcp": {
      "url": "https://speckitacceptance.clauxel.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons