Exogram Authority Runtime vs Selfmade Ninja Labs

In-depth architectural comparison of the Exogram Authority Runtime and Selfmade Ninja Labs MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

S

Choose Selfmade Ninja Labs when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Selfmade Ninja Labs Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools	S Selfmade Ninja Labs Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.	Real Linux labs your AI agent deploys, routes and runs, with domains, TLS, DBs and an audit log.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "selfmade-ninja-labs": {
      "url": "https://docs.selfmade.ninja/ai/mcp/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons