Exogram Authority Runtime vs PXL8 verified fight records

In-depth architectural comparison of the Exogram Authority Runtime and PXL8 verified fight records MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

P

Choose PXL8 verified fight records when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PXL8 verified fight records Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools	P PXL8 verified fight records Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.	Verified fight records for AI assistants: look up a fighter or fight card, cite the pxl8.io page.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pxl8-verified-fight-records": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "pxl8-verified-fight-records"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons