Exogram Authority Runtime vs Pokemon TCG Pocket Catalog

In-depth architectural comparison of the Exogram Authority Runtime and Pokemon TCG Pocket Catalog MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

P

Choose Pokemon TCG Pocket Catalog when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Pokemon TCG Pocket Catalog Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools	P Pokemon TCG Pocket Catalog Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.	Look up Pokemon TCG Pocket cards, sets, packs, and evaluate decks with battle simulations.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pokemon-tcg-pocket-catalog": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "pokemon-tcg-pocket-catalog"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons