Exogram Authority Runtime vs One MCP, many parsers

In-depth architectural comparison of the Exogram Authority Runtime and One MCP, many parsers MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

Choose One MCP, many parsers when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore One MCP, many parsers Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools	One MCP, many parsers Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.	One MCP, many parsers. Routes between markitdown, Docling, and LlamaParse. Plus an interpret tool…
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "one-mcp-many-parsers": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "docling"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons