Exogram Authority Runtime vs Nostr Ops MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Exogram Authority Runtime and Nostr Ops MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

Choose Nostr Ops MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Nostr Ops MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools	Nostr Ops MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.	Nostr publishing, queries, and DMs for AI agents, with allowlists, rate limits, and an audit log.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nostr-ops-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "nostr-ops-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons