Exogram Authority Runtime vs Speedrun Talent Network MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Exogram Authority Runtime and Speedrun Talent Network MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

S

Choose Speedrun Talent Network MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Speedrun Talent Network MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools	S Speedrun Talent Network MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.	Search live roles across hundreds of a16z portfolio startups and join the speedrun talent network.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-142": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-142"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons