Exogram Authority Runtime vs Laqta Video Edit Planner

In-depth architectural comparison of the Exogram Authority Runtime and Laqta Video Edit Planner MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

L

Choose Laqta Video Edit Planner when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Laqta Video Edit Planner Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools	L Laqta Video Edit Planner Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.	Validate video cut plans and parse timed subtitles for Laqta’s local browser video editor.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "laqta-video-edit-planner": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "laqta-video-edit-planner"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons